<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying out Hunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/comment-page-1/#comment-11812</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notjustrandom.com/blog/?p=621#comment-11812</guid>
		<description>BTW: I do have a few more invites available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW: I do have a few more invites available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Kautzman II</title>
		<link>http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/comment-page-1/#comment-11810</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Kautzman II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notjustrandom.com/blog/?p=621#comment-11810</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the invite Alex. I wrote up a little review of my own after trying it out

http://unseen.ws/2009/04/hunchcom-review/

I share your same thoughts about some of the shortcomings.  Hopefully this can turn into something useful because it would be nice to be able to spend a little less time researching some topics, or at least be able to get a second opinion you can trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the invite Alex. I wrote up a little review of my own after trying it out</p>
<p><a href="http://unseen.ws/2009/04/hunchcom-review/" rel="nofollow">http://unseen.ws/2009/04/hunchcom-review/</a></p>
<p>I share your same thoughts about some of the shortcomings.  Hopefully this can turn into something useful because it would be nice to be able to spend a little less time researching some topics, or at least be able to get a second opinion you can trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/comment-page-1/#comment-11727</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notjustrandom.com/blog/?p=621#comment-11727</guid>
		<description>Interesting, thanks for your feedback. Regarding (3) - yes, I think I could see cases for that. This may be outside your intended scope, but how let&#039;s take the following question for example: What math prerequisites am I missing for graduate school? Or more general, What knowledge am I missing to understand [any subject/article/situation/etc.]?

I would imagine, if we want a detailed picture, then exploring prerequisite knowledge cannot be easily done in just a few questions. It&#039;s not enough to ask &quot;Have you taken Discrete Mathematics?&quot; Rather individual concepts could be quizzed. 

A lot of decisions end up being pretty personal and require knowledge of personal circumstance (which of course changes over time). If I genuinely need information on an area I am not very familiar with, I may not know the best way of asking the question either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, thanks for your feedback. Regarding (3) &#8211; yes, I think I could see cases for that. This may be outside your intended scope, but how let&#8217;s take the following question for example: What math prerequisites am I missing for graduate school? Or more general, What knowledge am I missing to understand [any subject/article/situation/etc.]?</p>
<p>I would imagine, if we want a detailed picture, then exploring prerequisite knowledge cannot be easily done in just a few questions. It&#8217;s not enough to ask &#8220;Have you taken Discrete Mathematics?&#8221; Rather individual concepts could be quizzed. </p>
<p>A lot of decisions end up being pretty personal and require knowledge of personal circumstance (which of course changes over time). If I genuinely need information on an area I am not very familiar with, I may not know the best way of asking the question either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caterina Fake</title>
		<link>http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/comment-page-1/#comment-11718</link>
		<dc:creator>Caterina Fake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notjustrandom.com/blog/?p=621#comment-11718</guid>
		<description>Alex, thanks for trying out Hunch. 

To your first question: It&#039;s possible, even probable at this point, that the best solution isn&#039;t there. We hope that users will add them as time passes, and the best for each individual will emerge from the combination of the &quot;hard&quot; inputs (say, how much you will pay, or what your GPA is) the &quot;soft&quot; inputs (I care enough about design to pay more for a Mac) and the array of results. Hunch is very embryonic now, so a lot of things are the equivalent of Wikipedia stubs. 

To your second question -- yes! Over time Hunch should be able to deliver an &quot;I&#039;m feeling lucky&quot; kind of result for you. That&#039;d be magic. 

To your third question -- a question back. Do you think there are certain questions that would be better served by *more* than ten questions? 

Thanks for your feedback!

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, thanks for trying out Hunch. </p>
<p>To your first question: It&#8217;s possible, even probable at this point, that the best solution isn&#8217;t there. We hope that users will add them as time passes, and the best for each individual will emerge from the combination of the &#8220;hard&#8221; inputs (say, how much you will pay, or what your GPA is) the &#8220;soft&#8221; inputs (I care enough about design to pay more for a Mac) and the array of results. Hunch is very embryonic now, so a lot of things are the equivalent of Wikipedia stubs. </p>
<p>To your second question &#8212; yes! Over time Hunch should be able to deliver an &#8220;I&#8217;m feeling lucky&#8221; kind of result for you. That&#8217;d be magic. </p>
<p>To your third question &#8212; a question back. Do you think there are certain questions that would be better served by *more* than ten questions? </p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback!</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/comment-page-1/#comment-11717</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notjustrandom.com/blog/?p=621#comment-11717</guid>
		<description>Presumably, as more people contribute to the site, we will have a richer variety of topics and decisions to choose from.

I noticed a &lt;em&gt;Why did Hunch pick this?&lt;/em&gt; link after a decision was revealed. The presented explanation was not very descriptive though. Essentially, for a few questions: Because you responded like &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably, as more people contribute to the site, we will have a richer variety of topics and decisions to choose from.</p>
<p>I noticed a <em>Why did Hunch pick this?</em> link after a decision was revealed. The presented explanation was not very descriptive though. Essentially, for a few questions: Because you responded like <em>that</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://www.notjustrandom.com/2009/03/30/trying-out-hunch/comment-page-1/#comment-11715</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notjustrandom.com/blog/?p=621#comment-11715</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I wonder how much the systems learns about you from the answers.

But my main reaction to the site is that it doesn&#039;t offer me answers to many questions I care about. Maybe I just don&#039;t have enough burning questions to need a tool like this.

And the answers for the few I do have aren&#039;t very satisfying. For example, it told me I should pay someone to help me with my taxes. But it didn&#039;t tell me why. 

So, it&#039;s cute and still intrigues me, but still feels to me like more of a magic eight ball than a decision support tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I wonder how much the systems learns about you from the answers.</p>
<p>But my main reaction to the site is that it doesn&#8217;t offer me answers to many questions I care about. Maybe I just don&#8217;t have enough burning questions to need a tool like this.</p>
<p>And the answers for the few I do have aren&#8217;t very satisfying. For example, it told me I should pay someone to help me with my taxes. But it didn&#8217;t tell me why. </p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s cute and still intrigues me, but still feels to me like more of a magic eight ball than a decision support tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

